📰 Pressed for time? See the one-pager · 60 seconds
K–12 AI Governance · Togno

Know where your school actually stands on AI.

Two questions, in fact. Whether the school is protected — and whether AI is doing anything for teaching and learning while it is here. Most schools cannot answer either with evidence, not because they are careless but because nobody has ever measured it. AIP is the assessment, the policy, and the operating cadence that fix that.

Start the 20-question self-check See the framework Five minutes · nothing leaves your browser
15
Dimensions Scored
9
Free Tools
5
Role Assessments
16
Templates
36
References

Start here, then go as far as you need.

Three steps. The first is free and takes five minutes; the last is us doing it with you.

Step 1 · FREE

Assess

Fifteen questions. A score, a profile, and the three things to fix first.
  • 20-question self-check, scored instantly
  • AI Exposure Scan — find the tools nobody bought
  • Full baseline kit: 9 instruments, 205 items
  • Scoring model and interpretation guide
  • Runs in your browser — nothing uploaded
Start the self-check →
Step 2 · DIY

Tools

Worksheets you can fill in today. Print, share, decide.
  • Policy worksheet (12 sections, auto-saves)
  • Incident response protocol
  • Pilot Go/No-Go scoring sheet
  • Budget calculator with grants
  • Parent communications kit (EN/ES)
  • 5 role-based assessments
Open the Toolkit →
Step 3 · WITH US

Baseline Review

The parts a template cannot do: the evidence review, the room, the board.
  • Independent evidence review of your artefacts
  • Facilitated staff and community sessions
  • Your baseline interpreted, not just scored
  • Board-ready briefing and risk register
  • Living AI Policy v1.0, owned by your school
See what it covers →

Also here: the Blueprint — 16 deliverable templates showing what an AI programme should contain · the Methodology · the evidence base.

The Philosophy Behind It

9 Components. Precision Policy.

Guardrails · Parental Consent · Baseline Review · AI Literacy · Critical Thinking · Potential and Protection · K-12 Focus · Under Your Own Law · Evidence, Not Assumption.

See the Framework →

Want Togno to run it for you?

Two fixed-fee engagements: the ~5-week Review, or the 12-week Implementation. Statement of Work, deck, one-pager — and a real conversation.

Explore the Program →
About

The person behind it

AIP isn't a faceless framework — it's a service with a named expert who signs every deliverable. Meet Hector.

Research

Evidence base

18 case cards across the USA, Spain, Colombia & LatAm. 36-source bibliography. The data behind every recommendation.

Contact

Talk to us

Questions, pilots, custom programs: info@togno.co. We reply within a few business days.

Why this exists

AI can transform learning. So could social media.

Social media arrived in schools with no governance, no measurement and no agreed position. Everyone remembers the harm. What gets forgotten is that there was a real educational idea in there too — about connection, about collaboration, about a student having something to say and somewhere beyond the classroom wall to say it — and most schools ended up blocking the whole thing, because by the time they acted, blocking was the only instrument they had left.

It cost twice. Ungoverned adoption does not only produce harm; it burns the benefit along with it, and the students who most needed that benefit are rarely the ones who were harmed.

So the goal was never to keep AI out of schools. Governing AI well is not what slows a school down — it is what lets it move without having to stop later. Measure both things: whether you are protected, and whether any of this is actually serving learning. Then decide deliberately, in your own words, what you want the technology to do for your children.

See where your school stands — 20 questions, free →